Skip to Content
August 24, 2021 Thomas H. Segars
Posted in  Federal Preemption Misrepresentations

A Honey Boo Boo? The Ninth Circuit Discusses Bees, the “Reasonable Consumer,” and the Intersection of Federal Labeling Law and Section 75-1.1

Imagine yourself combing the aisles of the local Trader Joe’s with your brood in tow. You are minding your own beeswax when, above the drone of swarming shoppers, you hear a buzz about a new product: “100% New Zealand Manuka Honey.” As you grab a jar off the shelf, what […]

Read More
July 20, 2021 Scottie Forbes Lee
Posted in  Other 75-1.1 Issues

Does Noerr–Pennington Immunity Apply to State-Law Tort Claims?

A claim under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-1.1 can sometimes trigger a constitutional challenge. A defendant might argue that an unfairness claim under section 75-1.1 is unconstitutionally vague, or that applying section 75-1.1 extraterritorially violates the Dormant Commerce Clause. Or a defendant might argue that the claim concerns conduct protected by […]

Read More
June 8, 2021 Steven A. Scoggan
Posted in  Direct Unfairness Misrepresentations Substantial Aggravating Circumstances

Similar Theories Lead to Different Results (Including a $31.9 Million Judgment), Illustrating the Importance of Categorizing Section 75-1.1 Claims

As we’ve previously explained, section 75-1.1 claims for unfair or deceptive trade practices typically fall into five discrete categories. Categorizing claims is not always simple, but it can have colossal consequences. Today’s post examines two cases with three section 75-1.1 claims. Those claims share similar factual theories but resulted in […]

Read More