Skip to Content

Category: Class Action Basics

February 27, 2024 Matthew Anderson Andrew Parks Carter
Posted in  Class Action Basics

The Profits Are in the Corners: Exploring the Similarities and Differences Between Rule 23 of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure and Federal Rule 23

Whether bringing or defending a class action in South Carolina state court, counsel should closely analyze Rule 23 of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure to understand the foundations of class-action practice in the state. While South Carolina’s drafters adopted language from the federal rules, South Carolina’s version of […]

Read More
December 13, 2023 Chelsea Pieroni Christopher Rhodes Jr.
Posted in  Class Action Basics

The Eleventh Circuit Speaks Firmly on Calculating Attorneys’ Fees: Look to the Local Community and Mind Your Multipliers

In a previous post, we covered Sos v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance and analyzed the pick-off exception under Eleventh and Fourth Circuit case law. No. 21-11769 (11th Cir. 2023).  Sos involved another issue of significance: the calculation of attorneys’ fees, which is the subject of this blog post. Click […]

Read More
November 30, 2023 Chelsea Pieroni Christopher Rhodes Jr.
Posted in  Class Action Basics

That Don’t Impress Me Much! Recent Eleventh Circuit Decision Weighs in on Whether Paying Off a Class Can Moot a Class Action, with Fourth Circuit Law Remaining Inconclusive.

While perhaps rare, directly paying off a named plaintiff and putative class members before class certification is one tactic for potentially nipping a class action in the bud.  It can be effective when both parties are willing to play ball and negotiate a settlement. However, a recent Eleventh Circuit decision […]

Read More
August 22, 2023 Ty Jameson
Posted in  Class Action Basics Class Certification

Eleventh Circuit Decision Narrowing Certification of Ford Mustang Class Shows How Predominance and Superiority Can Defeat Consumer Fraud Class Actions

A recent decision from the Eleventh Circuit involving allegations of fraud in Ford’s marketing of Shelby Mustangs highlights how Rule 23(b)(3)’s predominance and superiority requirements can defeat class certification in cases where reliance is an element of the plaintiffs’ claims. Cases such as this one illustrate why the necessity of […]

Read More